Lights & Sound

In the world of music-making, quirky new instruments tend to come and go. But one description-defying gadget from Yamaha, the Tenori-on, might prove to be more than a fad.

Will the Tenori-on go on and on, or is it just a fad?

First launched in the UK last autumn and this year in the States, the instrument quickly earned media accolades for being innovative both musically and technologically.

Prominent musicians like Bjork are using it for performances and recordings. One Japanese band, The Tenorians, named itself after the instrument and uses it to churn out hard-driving electronica.

But most of all, the Tenori-on has one big advantage that most quirky new instruments never get: backing. This device didn’t come from somebody’s garage. It came out of a large manufacturer capable of making lots more Tenori-on (and a variety of versions).

It’s an unlikely tale. Yamaha gave the device a chance commercially only after years of lobbying from a few of its designers.

Despite a high price ($1,200) and narrow distribution channels, the company quickly sold more than 3,000 units. That, apparently, was enough to persuade the company of its broader potential.

Yamaha is now working on at least one new version, but the details are being guarded with a secrecy worthy of Apple. But with a low enough price, the product could appeal to mainstream consumers.

Like the iPod or iPhone, the Tenori-on is all about design. Whereas the former exudes California cool, the latter feels quintessentially Japanese.

In some ways it resembles Go, a strategic board game that’s been popular in Japan and East Asia for centuries. The rules and appearance of Go appear simple, but scratch the surface just a bit and the depth of the game becomes clear.

Looking a bit like a high-tech Go board, the Tenori-on presents a Zen-like 16×16 grid of 256 identical LED buttons in a square-shaped magnesium frame that’s easily held in the hands. At its simplest, press a button to produce a sound through the built-in speakers.

But along the sides are function buttons letting users make changes to volume, octave, tempo, transposition, note lengths, and loop point and speed.

In minutes, musical novices can be creating surprisingly intricate soundscapes. Meanwhile the device displays arresting light patterns in response to the buttons pressed, making it work on stage just as easily as on the couch.

To many musicians and performers, the product is something like catnip. Those who can’t access it pine for it in online forums.

“Once you understand how it works, it’s one of the most self-explaining and intuitive instruments you can imagine,” says conceptual audio artist Norman Fairbanks, creator of the first album to be made entirely with a Tenori-on.

“It really changed my way to make music,” he said.

Fairbanks expects to still be using a Tenori-on in 10 years and likes being able to compose on it anywhere. (It has a jack for headphones, a memory card slot for saving compositions, and runs on AA batteries or an AC adapter.)


3 thoughts on “Lights & Sound

  1. Pretty cool…interesting that the Japanese artist who invented this had actually been using the instrument in live performances since 2006, demo’d in late 2005. I like it when independents are successful!!

  2. Wow… I’ve already decided that I want to dedicate my life to perfecting the art of this strange instrument. You can look for my Tenori-on live album due out in stores sometimes around March ’09. I’m predicting that it’ll take the U.S. by storm and spur a craze not seen since the height of Beatlemania.

    But all joking aside, that thing is pretty damn cool. If only I could afford to get my hands on one (or at least steal one from some Japanese kid) so that I could actually see it in action.

  3. Lol AJ!

    This is truly an amazing instrument. The only downside is that all of the sounds are synthesized and there is nothing like live instruments and their raw human powered sounds.

    Soon instruments themselves will be antiquated – just like the 45’s and 8 tracks.

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous :)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s